|
|
| Author |
Message |
Aberforth
Joined: 17 February 2004
Posts: 301
Location: Hogs Head, Hogsmeade
|
Posted: Monday 6 March 2006 07 11 17 am in topic:Am I the only one who thought that the GoF film s*cked? |
|
I agree. Although there are things left out that I personally would have liked to have been included (such as Crouch Sr acting all weird when trying to reach DD just before he was killed), there are some that I'm glad they cut - I can't stand Dobby.
To keep the book to one film there was always going to be lots of things left out but I felt they did a better job than on POA where they missed out loads in the Shrieking Shack thats important to the story - that James was an animagus and who the marauders were etc. |
|
|
|
 |
inaya
Joined: 4 March 2006
Posts: 13
Location: LONDON
|
|
Posted: Saturday 4 March 2006 07 19 08 am Post subject: you can say that again i don't mind say at least a thousand in topic:Am I the only one who thought that the GoF film s*cked? |
|
|
times and say it to the warner bros faces, i hated the film i agree with you i just hopr ottp isn't crapper the GOF |
|
|
|
|
|
SEAMUS
Joined: 20 December 2005
Posts: 49
Location: FIRST FLYING LESSON
|
|
Posted: Tuesday 21 February 2006 06 31 33 am Post subject: GoF film next month in topic:GoF film next month |
|
|
Everyone next month the film GoF is coming out watch out |
|
|
|
|
|
noris
Joined: 1 February 2006
Posts: 31
|
|
Posted: Friday 3 February 2006 05 17 36 pm in topic:The Movies: Reflect the Books Well... or not |
|
i disagree. all the movies were the same and didnt do justice to an exellent story that is HP.
all the films seem rushed and parts of the book which jk spends time over are bearly mentioned yet somethin that she mentioned in passing ends up taking 20mins to play out on the screen. the trouble with using amature actors in the first film is that..... well u can barely call it acting its so wooden but you expect that. its just y mess with somethin that is perfect to begin with? to add the directors visions? wot a load of ****! it should of been taken pretty much from the book as most of it is describing the scenes a picture can do that in seconds then its all the dialoge to add, a bit of special effects and there u go somethin the fans would accept and bring new fans to the books.
i so should of been a director.
(they should of at least asked the fans how thay think it should be portrayed)
ne1 agree with me? or am i on my own?
(sorry for the rant) |
|
|
|
|
|
noris
Joined: 1 February 2006
Posts: 31
|
|
Posted: Friday 3 February 2006 05 05 17 pm in topic:GoF Like & Dislike |
|
i find the films are such a disapointment
even tho i no they cant fit it all in, in the time available but i sometimes find the film rushes through the good bits and drags out the irrilevant bits. soooo anoyin. if they cant make it properly trhen dont make it at all.
i mean wot was goin on in the first task dragon bit?
it completely went off the book and added a lot of crap. no need! the special effects were amazin but really you dont add/mess with things that was perfect in the first place.
just makes me mad.
my boyfriend found it good but hes not read the books, i just found it irritatin! |
|
|
|
|
|
Phoenix in the Ashes
Joined: 23 January 2005
Posts: 5320
Location: Wandering around the RPG Area
|
|
Posted: Sunday 29 January 2006 04 02 11 am in topic:General questions about the actors... |
|
Very harsh.
And she is. I've heard somewhere she's making something...
Besides, her style isn't exactly the sort of one that is impossible to make a comeback in.
It's not like hip action film.... that requires the top Hollywood stars at the time and is forgotten after 2 years. |
|
|
|
|
|
SEAMUS
Joined: 20 December 2005
Posts: 49
Location: FIRST FLYING LESSON
|
|
Posted: Friday 27 January 2006 02 55 05 pm Post subject: 4th Film in topic:4th Film |
|
A friend of mine say the 4th film (GoF) is coming out later on this year.  |
|
|
|
|
|
