Broomsticks And Owls

by **Neo** » Wednesday 11 June 2003 7:22:50am

But heirs are exactly the blood descendants of a person, so it can't be transfered to another person by taking a sword of a stone.

by **Holly Golightly** » Wednesday 11 June 2003 8:24:49am

Yeah, I know... but still... in some instances, the heir doesnt' necessarily have to be the first born...

by **han lin** » Wednesday 11 June 2003 10:14:27pm

indeed, i don't think it always has to be the first born
ahhhhh

by **Neo** » Saturday 14 June 2003 5:40:02am

Yes, it is just like kings, and pharaoes.

by **Holly Golightly** » Saturday 14 June 2003 12:28:54pm

I dunno... in some novels, yes, in others no.. just depends on who is writing the story!!!

by **han lin** » Saturday 14 June 2003 2:59:10pm

Ooooooooooh
what if ginny was the heir or.. hufflepuff or ravenclaw

i know she is in gryfindor but.... she could be the heir of one of these houses because she is the first girl child ?

(i still think it should be ron though, because i agree it does depend on the writer)

by **Neo** » Monday 16 June 2003 4:21:30am

I believe not, that is a blood thing.

by **Holly Golightly** » Monday 16 June 2003 6:19:25am

It's whatever JK wants it to be... she's the one withthe pen after all!!!

by **Barry Trotter** » Friday 20 June 2003 3:37:57pm

its up to JK
there might not even be any heirs at all :eek:

by **Holly Golightly** » Sunday 22 June 2003 3:15:55am

In all honesty, thats what I'm hoping for... i dont' really like this whole heir of Griff etc business... I think that it would be a kind of lame carry on from the heir of slytherin...

I do admit that if JK was writing about it, it woudl still be interesting, but still... I dont' like it!!!

Holly!

Broomsticks And Owls

Neville Longbottom

Who is online