Meet everyone here in The Great Hall for general discussions. Here you'll find a friendly place to talk about all things under the magnificent magical ceiling...even stuff not connected with Harry Potter!
Moderators: Nightcrawler, DucksRMagical, Broccoli, Run Away!!!, Phoenix in the Ashes
by Scellanis » Saturday 15 May 2004 2:21:15pm
Thats the same axiom...just worded differently and given a different number. As you can see my axioms are defined to be easier to understand....no doubt the quote Alice has is from a maths text book where they use fancier language and make more rigorous (and confusing) definitions.
-

Scellanis
- Hufflepuff Prefect
-
- Posts: 6570
- Joined: Wednesday 11 September 2002 1:25:07pm
- Location: Pretending to be a sea slug with 'go faster' stripes...
-
by ganymede » Tuesday 6 July 2004 8:07:11am
YEEAAAAAGH!!!!! maths!!! head for the hills!!!!!

-

ganymede
- Fully Qualified Wizard
-
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Thursday 22 April 2004 8:03:27am
- Location: Pakistan
by Gwared » Saturday 17 July 2004 11:54:50am
Paul wrote:Hee hee - both places are on the same finite affine plane of thought.

By the way, did you and the person Alice found both change your minds half-way through the explanations, or am I just totally not getting it?
Axiom 1: There exist at least four points no three of which are collinear.
Sonkem wrote:2. There are 4 distinct points in P, no 3 of which lie together on the same line.

Another way of wording the question that explains the confusion is;
"There exist at least 4 points, from which no 3 are co-linear" i.e a maximum of two can be on the same line (if I remember correctly...it's been over 6 years since I did any maths other than statistics).
-

Gwared
- Gryffindor Prefect, Landlord of the Three Broomsticks and Common Welsh Green Dragon Keeper
-
- Posts: 2766
- Joined: Friday 4 July 2003 9:18:57pm
- Location: Code 0 - EMERGENCY!!!!
-
Return to The Great Hall
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests