Broomsticks And Owls

by **TDM** » Thursday 20 March 2003 4:05:49am

i just heard off the TV that explosions could be seen over Bagdhad, and the sirens are going off there. that can only mean one thing...and it's not good...because it's war...

by **azn wizard** » Thursday 20 March 2003 6:40:16am

i know...stoopid bush :mad:

...they're fireing #$% missles already

....STOOPID WAR!!!!! ARG :evil:

by **Sacred Guardian** » Thursday 20 March 2003 7:02:12am

i hate to say it, and all who think otherwise can have their opinion, but bush is a retard

by **littlelib** » Thursday 20 March 2003 2:10:58pm

Yeah the UK is involved too

by **Sacred Guardian** » Thursday 20 March 2003 6:21:47pm

i can't believe they all went against the UN, so stupid

by **azn wizard** » Thursday 20 March 2003 6:37:20pm

yeah...we do have UN for a reason....hello BUSH!!! everyone send him a pretzel!!!

by **littlelib** » Thursday 20 March 2003 8:56:39pm

Its awful isnt it! You'd of thought they would have listened!

by **Claire** » Thursday 20 March 2003 9:15:03pm

uhh, guys?

The UN doesn't agree because all of the countries are serving their own intrests, not the worlds. I mean, Sadam isn't supposed to have weapons, but he does. He knows the consequences. Right now he is paying his price.

And anyways. War should be a last resort, but we're ON our last resort! Sadam won't listen! He is a psycho mass murder who should have been taken out at the first oppertunity. He killed more innocent people then I think this war will kill. I am not one for war, but in this case, I can't believe it didn't happen sooner.

by **RavenEye** » Thursday 20 March 2003 11:22:10pm

:sigh: It's horrible...but I think it needs to be done.

I really shouldn't be watching the news as much as a I am...but I can't tear myself away from it.

by **Sacred Guardian** » Friday 21 March 2003 12:45:42am

i know he's disobeying the UN, but there is a diplomatic solution

by **TDM** » Friday 21 March 2003 12:55:13am

well, there could be a less dramatic solution. that would be to send in twenty assassins to go after Saddam and his sons. but, it must just be to complicated for dear old Bush-->:???:

by **Sacred Guardian** » Friday 21 March 2003 2:00:16am

yeah, assassins would be better, not as many possibilites for civilian casualties

by **azn wizard** » Friday 21 March 2003 5:52:23am

hez got lotz of decoyz though...anywayz...i hope itz over soon...less innocent deaths a possible...life still haz to go on...
itz sad....there's been 3 warz in the last 25 yrs in that area...imagine...just when u finally start to believe in peace and build a living and therez war again....sad...really
and who sayz US doesn't have any private interests?....are we really that humanitarian (i know itz bad grammer but who carez?)

by **Sacred Guardian** » Friday 21 March 2003 7:05:34am

actually 5, Iran-Iraq, Persian Gulf, Serbia, Afghanistan, and this one

by **Shadow** » Friday 21 March 2003 5:48:37pm

OK, you guys please quit criticising Bush. I know, your entitled to your opinion, but if you think Bush isn't doing a good job, you try being President and see if you can do a better job. Bush is trying to do what he thinks is best. If you still think otherwise, well, your entitled to your opinion.

Broomsticks And Owls

[news] America is at War

[news] America is at War

Who is online