Broomsticks And Owls

by **Hermione** » Sunday 23 March 2003 2:25:25am

I know this was argued about back in October, but- yes, Percy definitely has red hair in the movie.

But he lost his glasses and his pompousness. I miss that

by **star_light** » Sunday 23 March 2003 3:45:04am

I wonder why they took things like his glasses out. I mean he hasn't really said to much in the movies but over all in the movies they have taken out all of the little details that make the book so enjoyable. It upset me so much that they took out his girlfriend and that they gave Harry brown hair and blue eyes.

by **azn wizard** » Sunday 23 March 2003 8:50:39am

really? i thought his hair looked black in the movies....

by **Sacred Guardian** » Sunday 23 March 2003 7:57:01pm

so did i, oh well whatever

by **azn wizard** » Sunday 23 March 2003 10:41:44pm

i did notice the blue eyes tough....they should've made him wear green or yellow contacts....you'd think they could change the eye colorz wit such good tech. these dayz...

by **TDM** » Monday 24 March 2003 1:29:06am

the reason that he doesn't have green contacts is because radcliffe wouldn't wear them. stupid kid...

by **azn wizard** » Monday 24 March 2003 2:48:25am

what?? wouldn't wear them...geez...i mean part of being an actor is being the character....

by **Hermione** » Monday 24 March 2003 2:06:25pm

Hmm . . . I didn't actually notice the color of Radcliffe's eyes. I did notice, however, that his hair was impeccably neat throughout the movie

by **azn wizard** » Monday 24 March 2003 6:35:48pm

really?? i didn't think he waz that neat....not messy but not quite neat....

by **Scellanis** » Monday 24 March 2003 8:22:14pm

the reason he doesnt wear them though is because they irritate his eyes and make him blink constantly though....(that seems to be fact according to most websites)

not everybody is capable of putting things in their eyes you know...just because he doesnt wear them doesnt mean hes stupid

by **Hermione** » Monday 24 March 2003 10:28:40pm

Well, neat compared to the way Harry's hair is supposed to be, anyway. Remember how J.K. Rowling mentions throughout the books that Harry's hair is always a mess?

by **azn wizard** » Tuesday 25 March 2003 5:49:34am

ic....but his hair kinda looks like the way it does on the cover of SS

by **star_light** » Wednesday 26 March 2003 2:18:20am

I agree, his hair was to neat. So was Hermione's, in my opinion at least. I always imagined her hair as a frizzy blob of curls. For anyone who has seen legally blonde, I always imagined her hair like the daughter of the guy who got killed hair.

by **Holly Golightly** » Saturday 12 April 2003 9:20:56am

I thought that Hermione's hair was awesome in the first, all frized out and stuff, but in the second movie, the went and made it curls instead of friz.

And I think that it was annoying how they have made her look very 'pretty' in the second movie. I mean, she shouldn't be ugly onything, but I think that she just looked too 'pretty'.

Does that actually make any sense to anyone other than me?

by **Bren Creevy** » Tuesday 22 April 2003 11:50:28pm

That is strange

Broomsticks And Owls

Discrepancies in the Movie

strange

Who is online