pandora315 wrote:About ghosts- there are a few types of ghosts in the harry potter serious. We know that its possible to make plans in advance to leave traces of yourself (and also through dark magic to become human again after ghost form) Nick did it and Vodemort did it as well.
This is a minor detail, but I don't think Nick "made plans" ahead of time to be a ghost... I think, at the moment of death, he panicked, and now he's a ghost..
Myrtle, at the very last second of her life, was so determined to pay Olive back that she became a ghost,
true 'nuff
and Peeves is a ghost who seems to thrive on tricking people.
very slight difference, Peeves is a poltergiest, not a ghost. What the difference, I do not know, and if someone DOES know, please tell me!

Aside from picking things up, Peeves can also apparently wear real clothes (I think he's wearing a regular hat at some point, maybe the Deathday party?)
Also, why does Dumbledore allow Peeves to stick around, when he most likely has the power to banish him (after all, living people banished Myrtle to her toilet)? Does Dumbledore keep Peeves and the other ghosts around as semi-spies (like DD has eyes all over Hogwarts with them?), or does he realize that Peeves and the others could be valuable allies, but dangerous enemies (Peeves works against Umbridge... in fact, it's the only time he works "with" anyone)? Any thoughts?
We also have the ghosts of Cedric, Frank, Bertha, and Harry's parents who make and appearance to heplp someone in need.
They weren't ghosts, they were shadows that held a likeness in body and character to the person, but if Priori Incantatum hadn't worked in the way it worked with the wands being brothers and all, then they wouldn't have shown up.
We also have yet to find out more about the Fat Frier, The Grey Lady, and the Bloody Baron. Anybody have ideas on them?
I'll do some research, but the only theories I've heard about them is that they resemble real people in history... but I'll have to read my trusty theories book before remembering who they were.
The other thing that I have to say concerns the comment about JK writing more novels from other charaters point of view. I think JK has statd numerous times that one of the main reasons she writes (aside from fulfilling a personal need) is just to see people reading. I think there will always be a curiousity and a demand for her writing, and although yes, I'm sure she would stand tomake more money, she would be fulfilling people wants at the same time. You can't criticize someone just because their gift can earn some money. While anyone else can have any opinion they like,mine is that as a writer you write what is in you to write because you have to, not because you want to make a paycheck.
I certainly hope J.K. Rowling continues to write, because I think she's a genius, and that would come across in any book. However, I would hate for her to keep doing the Harry Potter thing long after the seventh book because after she's already stated that she's doing seven Harry Potter books, and the story will be finished, to continue writing Harry Potter books would be hanging on to past success. I hope she continues to write books, and I'll buy them, read them, and probably love them because I like her writing... I just don't want to be reading about Harry when he's thirty years old (she's stated in an interview that she has a problem with authors who freeze their characters in one age)...